- yes
- no
0
voters
Or would that be too much trouble?
Its possible, but it should be used only on posts where people state that its their own works, not generated
4 Likes
I see, thank you blife
That can be mentioned in the flag option
It should be something like
āAi generatedā
āThis person is using AI stating that itās their works or using AI on someone elseās workā
3 Likes
Sup ya
I doubt this one, as we already see AI-generated videos from mainstream bands, AI-assisted art in movie posters, and soon, Iām sure we will see full movies with AI effects.
Posting AI-generated content for entertainment purposesāwithout falsely claiming āI drew itā and without deepfakesāis one thing. If its not ment to harm anyone.
Posting AI-generated images as āOWNā art; using deepfakes; or altering someone elseās work is another. Here we should take action, especially if its ment to mislead
4 Likes
Well reason why we donāt see any movies with those things yet is because AI literally rips from artists works without permission in the first place, the mainstream bands that did this are getting backlash from using it
There is already a copyright law in the U.S about using AI for those types of things
Just because they used it doesnāt mean it was ethical in the first place
This is the description for the flag
This is the name of the flag
Unless youāre trying to say it counts as āinappropriateā
Yes, there is. But U.S. copyright law doesnāt ban AI artāit only prevents it from being copyrighted, making it public domain from creation, not illegal. Thatās why I suggested my version of the flag reason
Here I agree with you, using the works of others without their permission is unethical
I Know Why heās doing this
I used ai to Enchance this book I wrote.
Lol I wrote most of it myself
ai did the spell and Grammer checks.
Who is he?
I mentioned the law because you randomly stated about mainstream bands using it and those kinds of things
Not randomly, but as an example that AI usage is already happening and will continue to grow, in my opinion. Just like in math calculations and science, AI will contribute to medical advancements, such as searching for a cure for cancer, and much more.
Those were simply examples showing that AI is already in use , and it falls under the same legal coverage as described here. Everything except videos there belongs to the artists, and Iām sure itās copyrighted
Unfortunately for now, people are using AI to cheat in college and schools
Everyone knows that AI usage is happening, and everyone knows that the creators of AI generative images and videos want to get rid of artists (as it has been publicly stated before)
Of course, itās gonna still be impossible for them to get rid of artists because they have no creative process with a machine
Most likely not. Their main goal as to make money, and without artists willing to share their works with them they will have nothing to train their ai models on